Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainbow Pixie (Sub-group)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete no notability. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:33, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rainbow Pixie (Sub-group)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to warrant a separate article as they have only one release & info already covered in band's article. Rockysmile11^(talk) 22:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 22:31, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Rainbow subgroups do not need separate articles, and Rainbow Pixie is already a redirect to the main group. Random86 (talk) 00:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as none of this convinces any applicable improvements and notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not notable enough. Daniel Kenneth (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.