Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Mathur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:27, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Raj Mathur (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Do not appear to be sufficient RS to show notability JMWt (talk) 11:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also may be worth stating that the person who created the page has been blocked as a sock. JMWt (talk) 11:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Computing, and India. JMWt (talk) 11:01, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 11:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Trivial coverage used for sourcing. The name is too common to pull up this individual, I tried adding "linux" to Gsearch using his name, still too much stuff comes up, unrelated to this person (or nothing at all in Gnews). Delete for lack of sourcing. Likely not notable as an individual. Oaktree b (talk) 14:49, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.