Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raja Muhammad Zarif
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 00:15, 29 November 2016 (UTC)
Raja Muhammad Zarif
- Raja Muhammad Zarif (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable academic/researcher with no independent secondary sources discernible. Julietdeltalima (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete apparent PROMO created in July by new editor who also created the similar Ishaque Ahmed Ansari, which has a parallel dearth of WP:RS. A couple of quick searches offered no indication of notability.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:21, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Undoubtedly worthy person but zero notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:37, 21 November 2016 (UTC).
- Delete as nothing here for WP:AUTHOR or WP:PROF. SwisterTwister talk 05:10, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
- Delete not notable. sami talk 22:15, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.