Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 21:02, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rajali (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is yet another film article that fails WP:NFILM and WP:GNG.

References: One reference to a some type of blog with emoji's. Kolma8 (talk) 18:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 19:03, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - added few sources which refer to the film. Please note Wikipedia/The World operates in a way which seems to favour Western productions. I'm sure you can understand that 90s websites/scans of 90s newspapers online is incredibly rare. Neutral Fan (talk) 13:30, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as the article has been improved with the addition of reliable sources referencing so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 00:30, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Per WP:HEY Donaldd23 (talk) 16:36, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.