Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendra P. Parajuli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:46, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rajendra P. Parajuli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article doesn’t meet criteria for notability. Has promotional tone. Information provided are not supported by sources indicating COI of editor. Rahmatula786 (talk) 02:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Health and fitness, Medicine, Nepal, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 05:18, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Clear promo article with COI. Few online profiles cited in article are not enough for notability ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:07, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails GNG and no significant coverages. AgerJoy talk 09:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:Prof as WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 10:44, 11 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]
• Delete: Per nomination. Taabii (talk) 18:26, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:TNT and WP:TOOSOON. The formatting irregularities are a disaster. Generally, we almost never get to notability for scholars who haven't gotten tenure. Bearian (talk) 02:51, 13 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.