Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rajendra panchal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 20:36, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rajendra panchal

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to be a notable theater actor. The sources in the article are about plays that he acted in rather than about him specifically, thus not counting as significant coverage. My earlier PROD with a similar rationale to this one was removed by an IP. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:34, 20 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough coverage in reliable sources to verify or sustian article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Jbh ^Talk 11:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Included references are blogs. As a biographical target, he fails the notability standard. The article naming is, once more, for a person without a capital letter for his last name. Hithladaeus (talk) 12:36, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - My first searches immediately found nothing good so there's nothing to outstandingly say this subject is notable. SwisterTwister talk 04:09, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Bears all the hallmarks of a vanity page with not enough coverage in RS.Pincrete (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.