Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ram Reifen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. (non-admin closure) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ram Reifen

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability per PROF. The claim to fame is about chickpeas and this is the best "secondary" source--a page from a website called "VegNews". Please feel free to peruse the history, where you will see that I have been scrubbing the kind of directory entries and websites that are part and parcel of these promotional resume articles--this one produced a paid editor, and then edited by someone now blocked for paid editing. Drmies (talk) 16:43, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators and Israel. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:55, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep: his h-factor is 45 so is on the border for #C1, but only 6816 cites total. Highest cited papers has ~370, but 9 authors. I cannot find evidence for any significant awards which would tip the scales to a definite keep. N.B., this evaluation does not depend upon the chick-peas.Ldm1954 (talk) 22:23, 29 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Ldm1954 above me and the strength of the article in Haaretz, Israel's newspaper of record. gidonb (talk) 02:52, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:03, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as this does meet GNG after a review.Iljhgtn (talk) 02:02, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per above. Svartner (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.