Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramananda Prasad (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 14:29, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ramananda Prasad

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real claim of notability beyond translating a much-translating book and founding a society with no real notability claims. Been marked for notability for 7 years. Adam Cuerden ^(talk) 01:26, 25 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:15, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:16, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 02:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of passing WP:GNG. Someone with a similar name, Ramananda Prasad Singh, may be notable, but I think it's a different person. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:50, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:23, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. What would be needed here is evidence that his translation of the Bhagavad Gita is the standard one, or particular well thought of and widely read; alternatively, that he's notable as a civil engineer. Neither information seems available. DGG ( talk ) 05:59, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there's not yet a better notable article here. Notifying 1st AfDer and nominator Boleyn. SwisterTwister talk 06:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete despite looking extensively, I couldn't verify his notability, and neither has anyone else in the 8 years that this has been tagged for notability. Boleyn (talk) 11:55, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.