Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramendra Nath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 23:57, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ramendra Nath

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No scholarly mention of this person, nor any national level of prominence, even though this page is over 4-5 year old, it has not even thousand of search results(that refers to this specific person), other names such as "ramendra nath saha" or "ramendra nath nandi" being more popular.. And even the first page(of google search) is flooded with the profiles of those "Ramendra nath" that have to do nothing with this person. So not even popular, but obvious self-promotion. Bladesmulti (talk) 10:56, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 13:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 13:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me What did he do now? 13:04, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Agree with nom. Can't find anything on Ramendra Nath on JSTOR. Also, the department of philosophy at Patna University does not list this individual so even the weak claim to notability is not satisfied.[1]--regentspark (comment) 11:39, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No sign of media coverage or notability. Also, it appears that most or all of his books are virtually self-published ie. published by the foundation of which he is a leading member.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:35, 19 December 2013 (UTC)-- — Keithbob • Talk • 21:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.