Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randi Scheurer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 02:32, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Randi Scheurer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's indicated she didn't win the primary. She doesn't meet standard of notability for politicians. Elassint ^Hi 03:39, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Elassint ^Hi 03:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Elassint ^Hi 03:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Elassint ^Hi 03:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No valid claim of notability, sole "reference" is a primary source. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 22:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:16, 27 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Even winning the primary would not establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:13, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not much to establish GNG, although there is a mention here in the Chicago Tribue and a more focused reference here in a local paper.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:36, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.