Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangri dialect

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:11, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rangri dialect

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rangri dialect is not something that would be expected to have a standalone article on English Wikipedia.. does not appear to meet GNG. Saqib (talk) 07:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 09:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 09:48, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question: Regardless of the current state of sourcing and individual expectations to the scope of the project, how does deleting this article make Wikipedia a better encyclopedia? Sam Sailor 09:52, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, {{cite book}}s added, no problem meeting GNG. Sam Sailor 10:15, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as dialects are inherently notable. Though of course, if the nom would rather see all varieties of Malwi treated in a single article, they're welcome to merge them. – Uanfala (talk) 12:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In worst case scenario, I would opt for merge. --Saqib (talk) 17:22, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What does that mean? Sam Sailor 18:58, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:GNG. Sources mentioned in RS are reliable. Accesscrawl (talk) 12:41, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.