Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranjeet Baral

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:10, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ranjeet Baral

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Very promotional in tone, edited by single editor from new. Having a range of jobs (itself not uncommon for many medical professionals) or using new techniques is not sufficient for a doctor to be on Wikipedia IMHO. kashmiri ^TALK 23:07, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"using new techniques is not sufficient for a doctor to be on Wikipedia" the article never mentions the use of any "new" technique but being the first doctor to introduce a special "diagnosis device" in Nepal for diagnosing an impending heart attack. Dr. Baral is known for representing the 2012 London Olympics as team doctor, representing the doctors for the medical commission of Nepal Olympic Committee. Dblama ^TALK

Sources in books/journals , 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 ^Talk 13:43, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the subject is an active medical professional, but not notable.--Rpclod (talk) 04:50, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:59, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete promo advert, no claim of notability in the article, just another medical practitioner, some sources have trivial mentions of the subject, some are written by him, no in-depth coverage anywhere Kraxler (talk) 20:29, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Swarm ^{we ♥ our hive} 06:45, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Rpclod. FoCuSandLeArN (talk) 21:29, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.