Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 18:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Pandey

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Student union media coordinator fails WP:GNG Theroadislong (talk) 18:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:27, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Does not meet WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:21, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage Spiderone 13:07, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I really wish I understood why Indian editors seem so unusually convinced that student government spokespeople are automatically notable enough for Wikipedia articles — while articles about people at this level of prominence have occasionally been attempted in other countries too, it's only in India that there's a regular onslaught of them approaching epidemic proportions. But they're not automatically notable just for existing, and the references here aren't showing strong or convincing evidence that Pandey is a special case over and above most others. Bearcat (talk) 19:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't pass General Notability Guidelines. PlotHelpful (talk) 19:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Previously CSD'd under A7. This subject is non notable per searches and sources, and most likely non significant. JC7V (talk) 00:53, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.