Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravichandran C (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:26, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ravichandran C (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A complete promo. There is claim to be author but no proper reception or discussion of his work. The criticism part is cited from quora. Fails WP:GNG, WP:AUTHOR, WP:Academic. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 14:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Very promotional and rather poorly written (standard for these Indian articles it seems, judging by what I've seen from AfD and elsewhere; lovely stuff). A search showed that he does write books, but none are notable, and what I could find from the news aside from an insane amount of cricket articles shows that his most recent newsworthy thing was starting a debate online over a Hindi doctor doing an Islamic prayer for a dying COVID patient, which isn't notable on its own and is probably just routine coverage that isn't going to be brought up again within a week. If this is staying, TNT it, since it's very badly written and is chock full of promotional fluff. AdoTang (talk) 20:21, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, intro par says,He is a notable atheist, rationalist, author, promoter of science and rationalism, public speaker, blogger, YouTuber and debater. Absolutely not per the references available. Fails WP:Author, WP:ENT, [[WP:]] ☆★Mamushir (✉✉) 21:36, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.