Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravinder Indraj Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ravinder Indraj Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In addition to reading like a glowing campaign bio, the subject fails WP:NPOL as a candidate for a legislative assembly and fails WP:GNG as two of the four sources are just lists of candidates, one source is routine campaign coverage, and the fourth is a dead link to his political party's website. GPL93 (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 22:08, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Fails WP:NPOL, has never been elected to office and is a puff-piece as he is a candidate contesting the upcoming 2020 Delhi Legislative Assembly election. - FitIndia ^{Talk Commons} 09:46, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. LefcentrerightTalk (plz ping) 20:31, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT, WP:PUFF, WP:MILL, WP:NPOL, and WP:NOTINHERITED. Wow, this page is a mess. You'd think he's the crown prince of Swat. (Don't @ me, I know it's a different country; it's an old political joke). It's clear by reading through the lines that this is an ordinary lower-level party leader who's capitalized on his parent's influence. The posed body shot alone would be reason to delete this mess. He's never been elected to anything, and his notability, unlike his party position, is not inherited. His board positions are laudable, but don't add to his notability. Bearian (talk) 21:06, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.