Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rawiyah Al Samahi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rawiyah Al Samahi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I don't think this person is notable enough. I couldn't find enough reliable sources to prove its notability. فيصل (talk) 01:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and United Arab Emirates. فيصل (talk) 01:23, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Women. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:17, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- According to WP:NPOLITICIAN, the following are presumed to be notable:
Politicians and judges who have held international, national, or (for countries with federal or similar systems of government) state/province–wide office, or have been members of legislative bodies at those levels.
While coverage of her isn't massive, I do see a couple hits ([1], [2]), and given that her name is not consistently romanized, I wouldn't be surprised if there were some I missed. I also imagine there are even more in Arabic. Ultimately, I must vote to keep. — Anonymous 03:43, 1 March 2025 (UTC) - Keep for the same reasons as given by Anonymous, she meets WP:NPOLITICIAN. RebeccaGreen (talk) 08:36, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep: Satisfies WP:NPOL as a member of the Federal National Council. Obi2canibe (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep although she didn't do much to satisfy the criteria, she certainly meets it. jolielover♥talk 14:24, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly meets WP:NPOLITICIAN. Number 57 16:18, 1 March 2025 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.