Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ReNewIT

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. essentially promotionalism. There might be an opportunity for a nonpromotional article,b but it would mean starting over DGG ( talk ) 03:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ReNewIT

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A computer recycling company that appears to have generated some press for itself through a thorough media campaign, but does not, in the end, appear all that notable. All of the citations arise from stories that the company itself either wrote, or generated through press releases. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 12:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:30, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:59, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete - spam. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep | Rewrite Completely The Article clearly does qualify BLP. The article can be rewritten in a better way out. Dormantos (talk) 12:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This newly registered account has left the very similar deletion rationales on dozens of AfDs in rapid fashion. Likely he did not read any of the articles (one he said fails "BLP" was a company, for example). --ThaddeusB (talk) 15:34, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as clear spam/advertising. If it fails speedy deletion, then delete. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:41, 2 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy as above. Neutrality^talk 00:38, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.