Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Real NZ Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Real NZ Party (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable political party. The current sources only have one independent source that mentions it, and that is only a passing mention. I was not able to find any other independent sources that mention it. HenryCrun15 (talk) 09:22, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions.

Cautious delete Never registered, doesn't look like its going to run candidates, so fails notability, and any relevant info can be included in the Outdoors and/or Public Party pages. But nomination day is 18 September, so IMHO we should wait until after then for the cull, just to be sure.--IdiotSavant (talk) 10:20, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate info has confirmed they are not running anyone, so I support deletion.--IdiotSavant (talk) 02:51, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• I agree with that caution; wait till nomination day and see what happens. Schwede66 08:58, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I understand your reasoning, but the possibility of notability in the future doesn't confer notability now. Perhaps we should move this article to a draft somewhere, an move it back to the mainspace if and when it becomes a notable subject. HenryCrun15 (talk) 22:19, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to David Moffett, the name linked to the party in the only independent reliable source provided. Daveosaurus (talk) 07:12, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft space per HenryCrun15.-gadfium 09:04, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Change to Delete as they are not running any candidates.-gadfium 08:40, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Draft Not notable and unless something changes I feel is unlikely to be. So as it stands now, I'd delete, if someone is happy for draft space then fine with it going there as well. NZFC^(talk)(cont) 04:12, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Article does not meet WP:SIGCOV for WP:GNG or WP:ORGCRIT   // Timothy :: talk  20:02, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Move to incorporate into David Moffett article NealeFamily (talk) 10:51, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, Article does not meet WP:GNG , looks promotional. Alex-h (talk) 08:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete an unregistered party with no candidates doesn't meet the general presumption of notability for political parties. Doesn't appear to be significant coverage. power~enwiki (π, ν) 21:29, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.