Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Asphalt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn per WP:SK1(a) with no delete/redirect !votes. (non-admin closure) 2pou (talk) 17:12, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Red Asphalt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can't find any additional sources beyond the one in the article. Given the age of the Red Asphalt videos, sources may exist in print, but I cannot speak for certain on that. Either way, doesn't meet GNG as it stands right now. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 01:24, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to California Highway Patrol#Programs. BD2412 T 01:38, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: The films have received quite a bit of newspaper coverage over the years. I just added information from three sources: "Asleep at the Wheel" (Los Angeles Times, Jan 1998), "Driver's Dread" (Sacramento Bee, July 2003), and "Gore or Emotion — What Moves Teen Drivers?" (Los Angeles Times, January 2003), along with the 2006 LA Times citation that was already present in the article. Toughpigs (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, Education, Transportation, and California. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:28, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The lack of RS citation has now been remedied and WP:GNG is handily satisfied (I also just expanded the article a bit more with an additional RS citation - a chapter in a 2017 Rowman & Littlefield book; while it largely an updated version of the already cited 2006 LAT article with some additional information, this is good extra evidence of WP:SUSTAINED coverage). Regars, HaeB (talk) 05:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Willing to withdraw for now per sources found above. Still a stub that could do with improvement, but notability seems to be met for now. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.