Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reelection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Incumbent. Sarahj2107 (talk) 11:58, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reelection

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF. I am not sure if you can write an encyclopedic article on this. Mr. Guye (talk) 20:52, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 23:15, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete Wikipedia's not a dictionary. CerealKillerYum (talk) 01:44, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:DICDEF. Graham (talk) 02:35, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Incumbent, rather than deleting outright. This is a valid, likely search term, especially for newbies, and redirects in cases like this are no skin off your nose. Bearian (talk) 19:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good to me. I change my vote to Redirect User:Graham11 would you change your vote to redirect too so we can close this discussion? CerealKillerYum (talk) 03:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine by me. Graham (talk) 03:18, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I (the nominator) also

Agree to this new redirection idea. --Mr. Guye (talk) 01:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. All Deletes are now Redirects CerealKillerYum (talk) 05:50, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to incumbent per Bearian.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.