Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflection Pictures Studio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. asilvering (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reflection Pictures Studio (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have failed to find any independent and secondary coverage of this company, much less anything that would meet WP:CORPDEPTH, just database listings and self-published sources such as social media profiles. I draftified it but it was returned to mainspace, so draftification isn't an option here – besides, I do not think that sources exist at this point.

The only claims to notability made in the article are that the company has worked on notable films and worked together with notable companies – but notability is not inherited. bonadea contributions talk 18:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Film, Companies, and Maharashtra. bonadea contributions talk 18:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only founded in 2023 may be too soon. Nothing in google news, fails WP:CORP. LibStar (talk) 01:33, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: This is too early for this subject, especially without substantial coverages. Fails WP:ORGCRIT. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 13:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.