Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rejoice Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirected per WP:BOLD (non-admin closure) ansh 666 21:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rejoice Records

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Been around for 13 years and still one sentence, I think that should tell you something. Pariah24 (talk) 05:09, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 07:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MassiveYR ♠ 07:22, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect it to Word Records. This seems obvious to me and there's really no need to waste time on an AfD here. --Michig (talk) 10:13, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.