Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reliance Industrial Infrastructure

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:11, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reliance Industrial Infrastructure (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unneeded CFORK of Reliance Industries#Reliance Industrial Infrastructure, stub article is actually shorter than the entry on the main Summary page. There is no need for a one paragraph article when the Summary page already has the information.

Gails GNG and NORG. Single source in article and BEFORE showed nothing that meets WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and in-depth.

No objection to a consensus redirect (a bold redirect would be rv) to Reliance Industries#Reliance Industrial Infrastructure.  // Timothy :: talk  17:23, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Maharashtra. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom We really don't need an article on this at all separately. Nate • (chatter) 18:54, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This is a separate company, traded separately on two different stock exchanges. Reliance Industries only has a minority of the shares of Reliance Industrial Infrastructure. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 06:28, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:41, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Eastmain's comments above are compelling.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 19:24, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist. Disagreement rests on whether or not these are two separate companies.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:46, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep -per Eastmain's comments.~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 11:07, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.