Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RentHop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

RentHop

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable tech startup. Significant RS coverage to meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH not found. Article sources to routine finding news, passing mentions, WP:SPIP, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability.

The one source that may look impressive (The New York Times) is based on an interview surrounding launch publicity, as in: "'This is one of the best times to be launching this site,” Mr. Lin said. “Renters know this is a renter’s market (...). So the stars have aligned for this to take off.' " The article also includes: "Whether RentHop is a workable business remains to be seen" suggesting it's WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry; the company has not achieved anything significant just yet. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:51, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete a highly promotional article with insufficient reliable sources and no redeeming value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DocumentError (talk • contribs) 14 January 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The NYT article is good evidence to show that it is not yet notable. DGG ( talk ) 05:49, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.