Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renusagar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. A legally recognised settlement which can be verified in reliable sources. Hence, WP:GEOLAND applies. The nominator, RedBulbBlueBlood9911, is suggested to go through relevant notability policy of the subject before nominating the article for deletion. Thank you everybody for their civility. —usernamekiran (talk) 20:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Renusagar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No proof that this place is notable - only notable coverage was for a workers’ protest at a power plant in this town RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 11:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. RedBulbBlueBlood9911 (talk) 11:25, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. All settlements are notable per WP:GEOLAND. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep a town of 20,000 is clearly notable per WP:GEOLAND. Additionally, there may be coverage in Hindi or other Indian languages that an English-language google search won't reveal. CJK09 (talk) 17:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.