Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reo Griffiths

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Not notable, move to sandbox.. There is a consensus here that the subject fails to meet WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. There is no objection to moving the page to Govvy’s sandbox so I will move it there. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 13:47, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reo Griffiths (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. I don't mind it being moved into my sandbox as I do work on Tottenham related footballers there. Govvy (talk) 15:01, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 15:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 15:07, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Note Govvy (talk) I am willing to accept it being moved to your sandbox as a compromise. Dwanyewest (talk) 15:37, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:05, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Either Delete or Move as per Govvy's request. It's clear at this point that the page doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTY. 21.colinthompson (talk) 17:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftspace seems reasonable, as he is signed for a fully professional team, so may become notable enough in the not too distant future. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:18, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.