Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Responding to Conflict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Procedural close as Speedy Deleted.(non-admin closure) --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Responding to Conflict

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable, almost unreferenced, possible advert, disorganized page. Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 00:32, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:15, 24 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, joe decker ^talk 01:27, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - Clearly falls under G11, it appears to be tagged as such on the page. Mr rnddude (talk) 01:30, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.