Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retired MTA Regional Bus Operations bus fleet

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 23:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Retired MTA Regional Bus Operations bus fleet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NOTDIR. No significant reliable sources on page. On inspection linked sources are either dead or WP:UGC. NY Times cite on page does not mention the model of bus it is used against. Nightfury 14:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 14:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 14:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Nightfury 14:48, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, I don't see a substantial question as to whether this is verifiable regardless of the current state of links on the page. The history of the MTA's infrastructure, as with any comparably large and notable transit agency, is a relevant part of our coverage. postdlf (talk) 17:09, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Total fancruft mostly sourced by self published sources. This article could also be consider too: Retired MTA Regional Bus Operations demonstration bus fleet Ajf773 (talk) 08:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done, see here. Mtattrain (talk) 06:21, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and keep general information in the active fleet page. Mtattrain (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Sourced to personal websites, fails WP:GNG.----Pontificalibus 10:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.