Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revation LinkLive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 23:36, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Revation LinkLive

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails GNG and NPRODUCT. See also related discussion on the article talk page and at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revation Systems. Ad Orientem (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:10, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I couldn't actually find any sources talking about this system, with the exception of some press releases ([1], [2], [3]). I don't think the system will get more notable in the future, either. Enterprisey (talk!) 19:43, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as clear advertising. SwisterTwister talk 22:55, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete same reasons as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revation Systems. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:56, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.