Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revenge Matters

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. --MelanieN (talk) 01:14, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge Matters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable, unreleased, film - appears to be a "home-movie". Only citations were links to the same authors "website under construction" which did not even contain the cited material Arjayay (talk) 18:46, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD cannot be processed correctly because of an issue with the header. Please make sure the header has only 1 article, and doesn't have any HTML encoded characters.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:50, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Probably could be deleted for several reasons, but I think WP:TOOSOON works well enough. Earflaps (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This is not the same film that was previously AfD'd at Dhoom 4, in case anyone was wondering. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 03:38, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per the nom. - Sitush (talk) 12:28, 19 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.