Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revenge Prank

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 07:00, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Revenge Prank (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The show is covered by a few sources, but they do not prove to be notable. This reality series can be redirected or deleted, since it fails the guidelines set at MOS:TV and WP:GNG. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources 1, 3, and 4. There are lots of just TV ratings references, but these 3 are directly about the subject as a TV series. matt91486 (talk) 17:59, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Further independent sources: [1], [2]. matt91486 (talk) 18:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Do sneak peeks and trailers count? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - seems to be enough RS for this. Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:48, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - As the nominator states there are sources. I do not see how the guidelines mentioned are failed. Such-change47 (talk) 02:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.