Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewards for Justice Terror List
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. BLP and sourcing concerns Star Mississippi 15:36, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
Rewards for Justice Terror List
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rewards for Justice Terror List (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I PROD'd this list because I was concerned about the lack of sourcing. There are many individuals named on this list as having a bounty on their heads and we don't have articles on that individual on Wikipedia that could be used as some sort of verification (and I realize that Wikipedia can not be used as a source but the articles would have citations on it that could be used on this list). This seems like a potential BLP nightmare to be identifying individuals by name as terrorists without any referencing to a source or having any other information on them on the project but the fact that they are wanted terrorists. There is a DOS website listed as the source of information for this "Terror List" but I didn't have much success navigating it to find confirmation for some of these people. I think there should be direct citations or this list should be deleted. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. Liz Read! Talk! 04:50, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. As noted, a potential BLP nightmare, and would be rather pointless even if sourced, since it would then be a duplication of an existing database elsewhere which is both authoritative and kept up to date. AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Do not delete. Please do not delete this article. I do agree that this Wikipedia page needs more sources and I understand from a third-party perspective that this page on Wikipedia could make one uneasy and you make judgements based off everyone's saftey and best interest. The following individuals mentioned on this list have been previously involved in events that have result in mass causalities that have endangered the lives of many. sanctioned by the The United States Treasury for acts of terrorism from the list of Specially Designated Global Terrorists (SDGT) associated to Qods Force, Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, ISIS and so forth who have prior history to attacking United States critical infrastructures such as 911. Komorijuno (talk) 05:29, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Reduce and repurpose I would suggest to reduce the list to the most pertinent individuals and add more coverage on "State Dept website" itself. Geysirhead (talk) 10:00, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback, I will add more coverage from the US Department of State for Rewards For Justice Terror List. I'd like to make a chart for this similar to FBI's Most Wanted and dividing them into subcategories in accordance to the Rewards For Justice webpage. There's not many websites that have a full list of Specially Designed Global Terrorists (SDGT). Komorijuno (talk) 14:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Liz how are you? I hope all is well. I just added sources for the first person on Rewards For Justice Terror List. If you have free time, will you take a look and provide feedback? Thanks! Komorijuno (talk) 14:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Seems unsourced, most of the people on the list have articles, but we'd need sources after each listing to confirm. Oaktree b (talk) 00:21, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.