Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Lax

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rick Lax (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails to pass GNG. Zigzig20s (talk) 23:55, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:32, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep A quick check of Google News finds many RS since 2011. However, the article needs to be completely rewritten in keeping with Wikipedia guidelines. Yoninah (talk) 19:40, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Based on searching news archives [1], there appears to be substantial material about him sufficient to pass WP:GNG. Current news articles show nothing, but notability is not temporary. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:56, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.