Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rickey D'Shon Collins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  18:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rickey D'Shon Collins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage by multiple reliable sources. Also no indication of passing WP:ARTIST. Staberinde (talk) 15:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Staberinde (talk) 15:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: as insufficiently notable performer. Quis separabit? 03:22, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Recess either way by deletion or not because he was voicing one of the main characters of Recess so he is obviously going to be best known for this. SwisterTwister talk 20:19, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep I'd say it's borderline but I think he passes WP:ACTOR. He had starring roles in at least two TV shows (Danny Phantom & Recess) and starred in a few theatrical movies. He got a few Young Artist Award noms which isn't much but it's there. Nohomersryan (talk) 00:13, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. WP:ENT. Significant voice roles in Danny Phantom and Recess, the latter of which earned him concurrent Young Artist noms (which got lumped in with films). Both are in his youth, and he's not done much lately, but his article is notable if redone properly, not written like IMDB. — Wyliepedia 10:36, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.