Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rickrolling

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Joke AfDs may or may not be funny, but when they actually add a deletion tag to the article? No. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous.
Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Rickrolling

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly not notable. Nearly every source purporting to be on the phenomenon was actually giving blatant misinformation or, even worse, your usual self-published blog:

This source: makes no mention of the phenomenon
Unreliable
Doesn't mention the topic
Self-published
Only mentions in passing
Unreliable
Blacklisted link Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bring back mullets - Never gonna give 'em up. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 03:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.