Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riess Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. consensus is the quantity of references does not meet qualtity required Star Mississippi 01:58, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Riess Group

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP - little to no third party coverage. As far I can tell the company is only mentioned in refs #5 and #7 which are not independent of the subject. KH-1 (talk) 09:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KH-1 (talk) 09:44, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per multiple notable outlets covering. 195.171.202.164 (talk) 22:28, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On the contrary, there are 7 citations from 6 sources including WWD, Forbes, Financial Post as well as Netlify and Shopify which to my knowledge have no stake or interest in the company. 2A01:CB00:56:B100:F5F6:B805:BE5C:9F13 (talk) 11:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. 2A01:CB00:56:B100:C8AC:CD4F:504F:B926 (talk) 09:37, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unable to find any SIGCOV from RS. Fabiobengario (talk) 15:20, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It doesn't meet WP:NCORP. Some of the cited sources do not even mention the subject. MarioGom (talk) 20:21, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.