Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Gough

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 12:44, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Gough (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Struggling to find enough independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Run-of-the-mill businessman. Promotional tone. Created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 20:10, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:36, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:37, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 04:38, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Fails WP:GNG. Sources are promotional with company second party advertisement, passing or trivial mentions, or is just insignificant. There is no individual notability, failing WP:NACTOR with only bit-parts in three movies and one of those is in post-production. Eckim and DOPE fail WP:CORPDEPTH and the company relationship is not inherited. Otr500 (talk) 10:26, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia is not Linkedin.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.