Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rob Level

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:48, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rob Level (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLPPROD was incorrectly removed as all of the sources in the article are unreliable sources connected to the subject or from other unreliable sources such as blogs. The case against inclusion is strong from a notability standpoint as well: the only source to be found about him on Google other than YouTube is Wikipedia because the bot indexed this after the BLPPROD was removed. Additionally, the content is promotional in tone, and appears to have been written by an SPA with the intent of promoting the subject, making it excluded by WP:NOTSPAM and failing the second prong of WP:N. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:04, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:40, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• comment The blp prod was removed according to policy, (see my talk page) or read over section 2 and 3 at WP:BLPPROD under section objecting. There was a disagreemnt as to whether all the references could be considered unreliable. Antonioatrylia (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • To be clear: there is a valid disagreement as to whether the BLPPROD removal was in accordance with policy. I think it was a pretty plainly incorrect removal, and the place to resolve that is in AfD. Regardless, the subject is not notable so it should be deleted for that in addition to being a BLP with zero reliable sources cited. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:37, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NBIO. No significant coverage in reliable sources found. GeoffreyT2000 ^{(talk, contribs)} 15:54, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- largely unsourced fan page. Sources listed in the article are primary and / or WP:SPIP, and there's nothing better out there. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:42, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.