Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robosoft Technologies

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Not salting as the previous two deletions are almost a decade ago. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:49, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Robosoft Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Adds no value to wikipedia. Only promotions and nothing else. Light2021 (talk) 08:09, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Salt given the past 2 deletions for exactly G11, both happened before this article was once again restarted with the same damning advertising, and the history showing advertising-only accounts emphasize and confirm this, therefore we make no compromises or second thoughts about such blatancy, lest we damn ourselves a PR-publishing website. Please see also User:RobosoftTech which was literally used to advertise this article itself, along with the other clear advertising-only accounts since they only ever actually added advertising. Therefore we have enough with the sole basis of advertising, along with the basis of no notability, to delete. SwisterTwister talk 20:14, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:07, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- spam, and not even dressed up with some sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 08:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not seeing anything that would help company reach the WP:CORPDEPTH standard. Anup [Talk] 21:59, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.