Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robosoft Technologies (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Robosoft Technologies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Typical PR.Non-notable startup. Winged Blades^Godric 12:02, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that I've declined a CSD G4 nomination for this article as its content differs substantially from the version deleted in the previous AfD. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 14:24, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wikipedia’s business coverage needs to get better at covering foreign businesses. For example, the website Techinasia.com published a substantial article on Robsoft Technologies.[1] The Alexa rank of Techinasia is 8,798 which means it is one of the most highly trafficked websites on the internet (if its Alexa ranking was not gamed). [2] By all appearances, the website techinasia.com looks like a quality content website. So it appears to be a reliable source. Wikipedia unfortunately has no article on Tech In Asia that I could readily find. The Alexa rank for another website which covers the company is also pretty high – namely vccircle.com.[3] And that website looks credible as well. That article can be found at: Mobile app developer Robosoft secures $3.7M in Series A funding from Kalaari Capital The company is mentioned in other reliable sources in the article too. Robsoft Technologies employs 600 people which is a fairly sizable company. So the main problem is that Wikipedia needs better coverage of business/tech websites in Asia and better coverage of Asian companies. Wikipedia has an article entitled Asian Century which has experts predicting Asia as a major economic/cultural force in the 21st century. It is time that Wikipedia better covers Asian business/tech. desmay (talk) 01:21, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- promotional & no indications of significance or notability. For example, the level of funding is minuscule for this private company to be presumed notable. Available sourcing is insufficient to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:44, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. The sources referred to above and in the article are WP:PRIMARY and therefore do not establish notability. The Techinasia article referred to above is clearly an advertorial with the same tired formula including interviews and photos of the founder. -- HighKing⁺⁺16:34, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.