Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RockON.me

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:36, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RockON.me (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG: no significant coverage by reliable independent sources. In fact, no coverage at all. Thanks, ceradon (talk • contribs) 07:24, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  07:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  07:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  07:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.  ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  07:30, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Possible just WP:TOOSOON but, for now, there are insufficient sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. --— Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 08:00, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no indication of notability per WP:CORP, WP:WEB, or WP:GNG. --bonadea contributions talk 10:20, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.