Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rockerrazzi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rockerrazzi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotion for non notable business. Lacks significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Whilst there is a lot of sources but most are primary, used over and over again. Others are about other people with some not even mentioning this company. duffbeerforme (talk) 04:47, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The one source I checked (Rolling Stones) does not seem to mention the company at all. Fails WP:NCOMPANY. At best could get a short entry at some List of American record labels or such.--_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:43, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:21, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as simply an advertisement and the information and sources yield nothing else actually better therefore there's honestly nothing to suggest both notability and substance. SwisterTwister talk 05:31, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 07:58, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.