Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick Flynn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:10, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Roderick Flynn

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DOes not appear to meet WP:PROF, WP:AUTHOR or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 07:31, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 09:02, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 09:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Ascii002Talk Contribs GuestBook 09:03, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Could not find enough to establish notability under WP:PROF. Does not seem to pass WP:BIO either. May be notable in the future, but not just yet.--Eric Yurken (talk) 15:13, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seems short of WP:ACADEMICS, which is not altogether suprising as he is a plain lecturer at his university (albeit in the GB sense). Could not find evidence towards WP:BIO either.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 12:14, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - just - list all of his books.PatrickGuinness (talk) 14:05, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete He doesn't meet the notability critieria for either academics or authors. He also fails to meet WP:GNG.131.118.229.17 (talk) 18:03, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.