Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roderick L. Evans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Roderick L. Evans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

dubious notability. Can find virtually no coverage by reliable sources, seems to exist only to promote the subject FASTILY 07:18, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Bands and musicians, Poetry, Christianity, Florida, and North Carolina. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 07:59, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per a quick BEFORE search. If stuff exists offline or under a different search term, I can change my !vote. However, this looks like a case where no sourcing exists. ~ Pbritti (talk) 11:33, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I can't find any evidence of meaningful coverage in RS either. AndyTheGrump (talk) 12:16, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. A spammy BIO sourced entirely to self-published sources. No reliable sources exist covering the subject. The article doesn't even make a plausible claim of notability and could even be speedied. - The literary leader of the age ✉ 00:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.