Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roey Peleg (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. All of the "keep" opinions don't address the argument for deletion that there are not sufficient sources to meet WP:GNG. They certainly don't cite any sources. Sandstein 20:19, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Roey Peleg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The first AfD was closed as no consensus, with the notation, "as many of the "keep" votes lack supporting evidence or a foundation in policy. However, some do speak to the possibility of improvement with sources not presently found in the article. The absence of consensus does not spare this article from being renominated for deletion at a future point if additional reliable sources containing sufficiently in-depth coverage of the subject are not provided." 4 months after the first AfD was opened, and 3 months after it was closed, that sourcing has not been provided.Mccapra's original rationale of "BLP of a social activist who does not seem to have in-depth coverage in multiple reliable sources. I see passing mentions and quotes from him as a spokesperson but nothing to suggest that he as an individual has attracted the kind of interest that would demonstrate notability. May be too soon." Still holds. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:21, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete the sourcing in the article hasn’t improved and my view hasn’t changed. Mccapra (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The sources in the article teach that there is importance. Peleg is one of the leaders in the struggle and that has not changed. Peleg also won a prestigious sports competition--היידן (talk) 02:14, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Roi Peleg is known in Israel as one of the people leading the struggle against prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Protests against Benjamin Netanyahu. BAswim (talk) 06:23, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - A well-known, notable and sufficiently publicized political activist in Israel. --Omer Toledano (talk) 18:07, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• keep - Peleg is a notable person in Israel, known as an activist and one of the leaders of the public struggle against prime minister Netanyahu. The article has an encyclopedic importance. Danny-w (talk) 07:24, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep He is a notable person in Israel.Jackattack1597 (talk) 13:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - and once again, not one policy based argument among the keep !votes. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:51, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Sourcing is problematic, sources are passing mentions or don't even mention subject. Fails WP:GNG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.