Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohandeep Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Rohandeep Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't qualify WP:GNG. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Donaldd23 (talk) 14:41, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The references to till date did not establish the notability of the subject. fails WP:GNG. GermanKity (talk) 16:34, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Now the article is cleaned and verified with noteble media news link. The page should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2405:204:2189:d839:2fff:7b11:f398:9259 (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Due to lack of significant coverage in reliable and independent sources.
Refs 1 (The Print), 3 (Telegraph), 6 (Hindustan Times), are clearly marked sponsored content which are not independent, hence does not satisfy the requirements of GNG.
Ref 5 (Bhaskar) is also a WP:SYNDICATED source with regurgitation of the same content.
Rest of the refs, 2 (Cinebuster), 4 (Glamsham) and 7 (Koimoi) are WP:NOTRS. -- Ab207 (talk) 16:49, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.