Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rohit Saxena (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Rohit Saxena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional. There is no significant coverages to pass WP:GNG. Previously deleted through AfD, I don't see anything changed then. - The9Man ^(Talk) 19:50, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 20:08, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. The subject seems to be notable in Indian media. He's a media person, a local medallist, leader of a nation-scope taekwondo society, and recently a government personnel per [1]. Since WP:GNG clearly states that sources in any language are acceptable, I'm inclined to accept that he is a notable subject there... Besides the sources in the article, see [2] and references therein. Concerning the previous AfD, I believe the foreign language aspect was largely neglected, which is why it was unanimously deleted; this, or the article was very badly written by that time. Walwal20 ^{talk ▾ contribs} 02:20, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indication that the cited sources, bhadas4media, samachar4media, NewsDog etc are reliable. Hindustan, the only reliable source makes a trivial mention of subject. The position "Senior advisor of Media & Entertainment Skills Council" does not remotely satisfy WP:NPOL. -- Ab207 (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as promotional bio of non-notable figure. Mccapra (talk) 05:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - zero evidence of any notability; no coverage seen in reliable sources at a level that would be acceptable for GNG Spiderone 09:57, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete non-notable person serves as WP:PROMOTION only. ~ Amkgp 💬 15:33, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.