Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rojava Revolution Internal Conflict

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Rojava Revolution. Courcelles (talk) 00:14, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rojava Revolution Internal Conflict

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Already exists at Rojava Revolution, and in my opinion, the title doesn't warrant a redirect. Westroopnerd (talk) 16:59, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined to keep, as there's too much material for a section in the main article. That said, it needs work, especially regarding its sources. Gob Lofa (talk) 21:13, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:46, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:47, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - any useful content to Rojava Revolution as I can't see why there would be any need to split the topics at this point (its not like there are any WP:SIZE issues). Then delete (I can't see it being a relevant search term either). Anotherclown (talk) 05:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 03:40, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 09:15, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect: per Anotherclown. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 02:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.