Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Benedikter
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 01:32, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
Roland Benedikter
- Roland Benedikter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is a trainwreck. It reads as a promotional biography, it lacks independent sources, and the overtly promotional tone serves to create an impression of resume padding. It is fundamentally noncompliant with WP:BLP due to sourcing, tone and likely COI issues. It looks like a prime case for WP:TNT. Guy (Help!) 10:00, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 15:06, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Citation record (in Google scholar) too meager for WP:PROF#C1, no other evidence of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:53, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. BLP seems to be used only to advance a POV. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC).
- Delete. Agree, seems POV-push is the goal. Agricola44 (talk) 16:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC).
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.