Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronna and Beverly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:37, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ronna and Beverly

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Podcast appears to fail WP:WEB. With the exception of the twitter hash tag, all references are related to the podcast. No significant coverage in independent sources to establish notability. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 20:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Nick! I understand the issue now and will edit accordingly! Thanks! Icahnt (talk) 00:52, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 08:43, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 03:50, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article now has a variety of citations from disparate and reputable news sources, which include references to various stage shows and interviews with the creators of Ronna and Beverly, which should justify their notability. Rebeccaawigmore (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.